] the case review

Lu authorization of private cars http://www.unitedstatesenglish.com/ modified for taxi, soliciting route accidentally killed a pedestrian. In the face of the huge claims, Lu thought that the insurance company will as its running under the " " disaster; pay;. Recently, the court decision beyond the compulsory motor vehicle traffic accident liability insurance part of the more than 40 yuan by the Lu bear.

[

] the case review

Lu driving black car driving fast on a lonely road, even in front of a red light, also don't slow down. In one place on the road, he brake in time, will be a crossing of middle-aged men killed on the spot. Subsequently, the traffic police brigade of certificate issued by the traffic accident, finds the pedestrian did not pay attention to observe and ensure the safety in the road to cross the road without a zebra crossing, and the driver is not clearly observed the traffic condition, http://www.blogsupport567.com/ also not brake in time to take measures, there are illegal, so the two sides of the accident bear coequal responsibility.

family members of the deceased to seek compensation, Lu and vehicle insurance insurance companies together to court. In the trial, the two sides of the incident and the responsibility are no objection. The insurance company agreed to reasonable loss in insurance http://www.cheapdenverbroncosjerseysblog.com limit compensation for the plaintiff, but Lu driving non operating vehicle accidents in the operation process, agreed in violation of commercial insurance contract, and therefore do not agree with commercial insurance compensation.

the court considers that, according to the record of inquiry of the public security organs, Lu of the open car, and benefit from, is engaged in the business of transportation. The insurance company requires that in the range of commercial insurance in the exemption, the court shall support. Finally, the court decision to compensate the family 110000 yuan of insurance companies in the insurance to pay strong limit, Lu compensation for death compensation and funeral expenses and lost wages, transportation fee total more than 77.3 yuan of the 60% http://www.bestsportgame.com/ meter more than http://www.quicklinks321.com/ 40 yuan.

[statement] judges

why the court to support the insurance companies in the business of three party insurance exemption range? In this case the trial judge said that both parties in the insurance contract agreed to special clear the form of non operating vehicles engaged in the business of transportation, the insurance company is not responsible for compensation. Lu holds the commercial insurance policy, should have known related terms. At the same time, open the black car behavior will obviously make the dangerous degree increases, and the Lu paid no attention and did not inform the insurance company. Therefore, according to the contract, the insurance company requirements in the range of commercial insurance in the exemption, in conformity with the law.