not that the only conclusion

August 22nd, the Fujian Provincial Higher People's court in Fuzhou sentenced to public according to the law, was charged with the crime of throwing dangerous substance the appellant Nian Bin acquitted, the appellant Nian Bin do not bear civil liability. After the http://www.firsttime123.com/ verdict, the Supreme Court of Fujian spokesman on trial, convicted of serious situation, answered a reporter's question.

facts are not clear evidence of less than

cannot be established.

reporter: the case of Fujian high court appeal why eventually declared innocent?

answer: the trial of the second instance, the Fujian high court that, this case except the appellant Nian Bin confession, or identify the victim poisoning due to lack of evidence, poisoning methods based on uncertainty, source of toxicant basis is not sufficient, and the appellant's confession could not confirm each other, relevant evidence of contradictions and doubts can not reasonably explain, exclusion, all the evidence is not up to the standard of proof is, well, not that the only conclusion, the appellant Nian Bin.

first, about the victim cause poisoning, because according to the identified physical and chemical inspection report two the cause of poisoning is not really, other dinner http://www.happyfiesta123.com/ staff identified the cause of poisoning or without poisoning lack evidence, therefore, the identification of two victims died of fluoroacetate rodenticide poisoning unclear facts, not really, not sufficient evidence. Second, about the http://www.mymusic666.com/ poison, the pot of water, high pressure and iron pot extraction inspection process is not clear, the source materials relevant http://www.cheapdenverbroncosjerseysblog.com evidence between the contradictions and doubts can not find reasonable explanation; the inspection process is not standard, inspection conclusion not indeed, physical and chemical inspection report is not enough to accept, http://www.cheapseattleseahawksjerseysblog.com therefore, that pot of water lack is toxic on the basis of the original, that Nian Bin will be put on the aluminum water jugs of water of the facts are not clear, the key evidence chain interruption. Third, about the source of toxicant, because Nian Bin and Yang Yunyan can't identify each sell rat poison, for there is no coincidence, physical and chemical inspection report prepared by tools is not enough to accept, therefore, the original that Nian Bin put rat poison to buy Yang Yunyan a day basis is not sufficient. In addition, there are contradictions between before and after Nian Bin confession and other evidence, cannot obtain the reasonable explanation or exclude.

therefore, the judgement that the appellant Nian bin commit crime of throwing dangerous substance facts unclear, insufficient evidence, the prosecutor accused the Nian Bin crime name cannot be established.

case complicated

prudent decision to ensure the fair

reporter: the case from beginning to the final closure why for so long time?

answer: the death of the two case of minor poisoning, the consequences are very serious, not only important, but difficult, complex, trial in local and outside the province are concerned. In fact, the legal responsible spirit, the people's court according to law, justice, always carefully, carefully to hear the case. Especially the Fujian Supreme Court in the trial process, adhere to the principle of trial center and evidence, end all possible verification of the facts, a review of the evidence, carefully study, ensure fair >